Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Sex up the back stairs

She's the historical woman people most love to tell dirty jokes about. Catherine the Great. We've heard she had an insatiable -- gobble, gobble -- appetite for sex. We've even heard she was into animals -- huge, hefty long-dong animals of the equine sort, and it has made for some nice puns on "a good ride." We've probably also heard that she died legs astraddle, crushed by a horse. The most graphic version has a hoist in it. As in, the hoist was designed to lower the horse onto her awaiting loins and it broke. Smoosh.
Ah, well, so much for the fantasies of Victorian preachers. It was Samuel Schmucker, an American Lutheran preacher who in 1855 cited Catherine the Great as "one of the most corrupt, sensual, and licentious of women." I guess he meant sensual in a bad way. Let's face it, very few of your "colorful" historical figures made it through the 19th century's gauntlet of moralizers without picking up a few nasty epithets.
So just how debauched was Russia's Catherine II after all? In some ways we moderns may be disappointed. Well, yes, she did in fact have 12 lovers that historians can prove. And it's likely the real number is much higher and includes the odd foreign dignitary like "Prince Charming," France's Prince de Ligne. But wait. Twelve lovers? Check the results of any purity poll to find that 12 is the average number of lovers the American woman will have over the course of a lifetime. Catherine lived in a different time. The bulk of her affairs happened between 1762 when her husband mysteriously died (OK, most certainly at the hands her then-lover -- a minor detail) and 1796. In other words, Catherine hanky pankied her way through palace favorites as George Washington froze his butt off along the Potomac and aristocratic heads rolled along the streets of Paris. The best of times, the worst of times, and also a time when the weaker sex, it was believed, would drive the world to wrack and ruin if their "nature" wasn't kept in check. In that context, Catherine may have seemed quite loose.
A lot of the saucy details of Catherine's "depravities" come from the writings of foreign ambassadors in the days when an ambassador didn't just come for a day and a dinner; he planted himself and grew roots. So we have to think of Catherine as the old-world equivalent of a movie star entertaining international paparazzi as house guests -- for months. But even though our sources are often no more reliable than the 18th century's version of the National Enquirer, historians have clung to these accounts. 300 year-old information is hard to come by. Besides, Catherine meticulously burned every letter she received from her lovers as she went along.
How she managed to carry on a love life at all is something many a modern day star might like to know. Not that anyone who was anyone at court was unaware of her affairs.
Still Catherine's sexual behavior around the palace was nothing we'd call daring. No orgies, no infamously lewd companions -- though she did have a bastard or two who lived quite openly at court. But even while entertaining guests in her private rooms or in her private carriage, Catherine would not tolerate off-color jokes. And yet there are visitors and courtiers on record calling her behavior with her lovers disgraceful. Why? Was she playing footsie under the table at state dinners? Copping a quick feel from alover behind the throne? No. The problem seems to have been those wayward glances. During a state affair, she might cast a quick glance at her paramour across the room, and guests recorded this "scandalous" behavior in their letters home. She was under strict laws of decorum.
What we can say of Catherine is that she needed the companionship of a man, companionship in a large sense. She preferred affairs of the heart. She once explained that the heart had a mind of its own and that she had given up on controlling it. However, she did admit to her lover and ever-after friend Potemkin that she'd had casual affairs -- out of desperation and loneliness. It seems also true that in the bedroom, she was, well, OK, rather robust. She liked it hard and hardy. "My head is like that of a cat in heat," she once wrote Potemkin. Some say she actually married him, and if she did, it was done in secret. She called him "husband" and "master" in her letters. Pet names, perhaps. At any rate, Potemkin became her most trusted minister; he became prince of the Crimea (after securing that region for her). And long after the relationship cooled -- they had two torrid years of passion -- he continued to execute her royal plans, she calmed his moods, she relied on his advice, he fostered and procured her ever-fresh supply of stud meat -- oops. Uh, yes, this is also true.
Catherine was at her best as a stateswoman and overall power-person when she had a warm bed to retreat to at night. So most people close to her knew it was in their best interests to keep her passions supplied. Potemkin, the amicable ex-lover, took charge of this duty. He hand-picked young (most always twenty-something) men, guardsmen (that is, the soldiered elite), dashing, bright, promising in statecraft. And with nice bods. Well, and, it appears, staying power. There is some evidence to suggest that Catherine's closest ladies in waiting actually gave the potential suitors a trial run to test their, well, whatever aspects of their virility Catherine wanted tested. "Vigor," according to the reports, was most certainly one of them.
A rather long line of young lovers followed Potemkin.
And Catherine was always good to her men in many ways. Even when one of her lovers betrayed her by getting engaged behind Catherine's back, she offered him the palace for his wedding and to boot, gave him a castle of his own. Henry VIII she was not.
Catherine's paramours, politely called "favorites," became official when they were installed in the "favorite's" quarters, a luxury suite right below her own. The suite came with a spiral staircase that quite coincidentally led from his to hers. Ah, discreet and easy access. No sooner was the gentleman installed in that room, when he underwent a meteoric rise at court. He suddenly found himself as a top minister, a general, or other position involving great national responsibility. If he lacked education, Catherine saw to it that he had the best tutors (Catherine liked them smart, cultured, and able to discourse in French literature). And when the thrill was gone, the lover vacated the favorite's room, often given an estate or castle, but with gobs of money and peasants (yes, they gave away peasants like livestock). Many of Catherine's lovers remained competent and devoted servants at the posts she'd groomed them for.
Of course, there is one aspect of Catherine's appetite that even we moderns may have trouble getting our sexual mores around -- and it's not about beasts. It's the fact that all Catherine's lovers from Potemkin's time on were 32 or younger. When she took on her last lover, Plato Zubov, she was a woman of 60. He was 22. They still had some form of intimacy at her death when she was 67 to his 29 -- a veritable Harold and Maude romance. The fact that we can think of only one such film in a 50 year film history, suggests that we may not be any more progressive regarding this taboo than Catherine's contemporary critics.
Only slightly less acceptable in those days than her penchant for young things would be the idea of a young man sleeping his way to the top. Even in our time, it might be cause for ridicule or embarrassment. In Catherine's time, it was truly scandalous. In one case, the young man's family disowned him in absolute disgust over his position as the Czarina's lover. The fact that he earned his titles and power through her was even more despicable. This was the 23 year-old Alexander (Sasha) Lanskoi. It was perhaps Catherine's most bittersweet relationship of all. She was settling happily into grand-motherhood and Sasha completed her intimate circle. In fact, he seems to have loved her. He offered Catherine family and political advice that smoothed out sticky situations, as opposed to advice that merely advanced himself. Other factions at court tried to buy him off -- he wouldn't be bought. Historians have combed the personal letters of the time for information or mention of Sasha Lanskoi, and despite the many mentions of his name, none had a bad word to say about him. Well, there was a doctor who cast aspersions on certain of the young man's qualities, hinting that Sasha regularly took an herbal sort of "Viagra" in order to satisfy Catherine in bed. Dr. Wickard was not a regular palace doctor, but a specialist called in when Sasha took fatally ill. Wickard's theory was that the prolonged use of this "Viagra" weakened Sasha's constitution. Whatever the case, Sasha died of the sudden illness at the age of 26. Other hostile members of the court suggested he may have been poisoned. More objective modern conjectures say that -- since reports told of his throat closing up until he had trouble breathing -- Sasha caught diphtheria. It is also said that Catherine sat with Sasha, nursing him right up to his death. Catherine was crushed, remained in bed for weeks and depressed for months. She had a church built where Sasha could be buried along with his entire family. Even after death, his family remained so hostile they refused to be buried in that church, leaving his body in the church alone.
That was in June. By September, Potemkin had selected another young man to introduce to the queen. Though this and successive relationships never reached the pitch and passion as that with Sasha, Catherine the Great continued on with her line of young men until her death in 1796. No, it really doesn't seem Catherine was very sluttish by our standards. Her sexual practices, other than the odd job of cradle-robbing, were not particularly off the map. But she drew heated criticism down through the centuries. Lucky for us, a lot changes in 250 years.

To Swing or not to Swing?

So you're thinking about swinging. Should you or shouldn't you?

Number 1: Can you say communication?

In one sense, any couple can swing. Just get out there and take the leap. But the stopper is that even when you’ve got a decent relationship going, swinging can bring up an untold morass of interpersonal issues. Not only does swinging give a couple lots more to communicate about, but it adds more people into the mix to communicate with. So if you're looking for a "smooth entry" into the swinging lifestyle, the place to start is establishing good communication habits.

Talk it through thoroughly, over weeks (or months even) of careful deliberation, before acting. One good thing about all this communication is that a couple can often clear the air of any sticky issues that have been lurking in the shadows of their love life.

While you and your partner are talking it over, you'll find some food for discussion below, based on what happy swingers and unhappy experimenters alike have to say about their experiences.

Read and respond to the questions separately (some are multiple choices and some are write-ins). Then get together as a couple to compare and discuss your responses. The 1 - 10 scale questions can be of great use when you're planning limits and boundaries because they give you a clearer idea of which things are going to be compromises and which are worth compromising for.

The first set of questions is under "why do I want to do this?"

1) If you're having sex with the swinging partner of the opposite sex, where do you want your partner to be?
a. In there with you
b. Doing their own thing with your partner's spouse
c. Watching
d. A mixture of all of these

2) How do you feel about
a. having sex with a swinger of the opposite sex?
b. Having sex with a swinger of the same sex?
c. Your partner having sex with a swinger of the opposite sex (opposite to your partner)?
d. Your partner having sex with a swinger of the same sex (same sex as your partner)?

3) On a scale from 1 - 10, how much of a turn-on would it be to watch:
a. your partner getting it on with another couple
b. your partner getting it on with a member of the opposite sex
c. your partner getting it on with a member of the same sex

4) On a scale from 1 - 10, how much of a turn-on would it be to:
a. have sex with another couple, both male and female
b. have sex with a member of the opposite sex (other than your partner)
c. have sex with a member of the same sex

5) On a scale from 1 - 10, if you knew it was one of your partner's hottest fantasies, how strongly would you be motivated to do the following:
a. Have sex with a couple, both male and female
b. have sex with a member of the opposite sex
c. have sex with a member of the same sex

When you and your partner go over your responses to the five questions above, there should be a nice mix between your turn-ons and your partner's. In other words, if there's a great imbalance and it starts to look as though the swinging activities benefit one partner way more than another, you'll need to do some serious talking. There are two things to consider:
• Your relationship might actually need some foundational work before you step into the swinging lifestyle.
• If you go into swinging with this lop-sided set of motivations, the road of your relationship could get bumpy rather quickly.

Sometimes couples consider the swinging lifestyle when they feel like their relationship is sinking fast. Although anything's worth a try when a couple really wants to stay together, swinging probably shouldn't be the first thing on your list. It may force all sorts of seething resentments out into the open. And it brings other people into the fray. Swinging can easily bring up issues of jealousy even for the most seasoned swinging couple. And jealousy's not the most practical lifeline to throw a drowning relationship.

The other area for concern is communication. The number one qualification for couples who want to swing is the ability to communicate honestly and candidly. And couples who are having troubles with their relationship are often couples who are, for whatever reason, no longer communicating well.

Test your communication status:
• Did you have trouble filling in the answers on the above questions?
• Did you think, "oh, this is silly" or "s/he already knows all this?"
• When you and your partner got together to discuss your responses, were you negatively surprised or disappointed in some of your partner's answers?
• Were there some answers in your partner's responses that really took you by surprise, whether in a good way or a bad way?
A yes to any of these means you may need help with communication.

Swinging requires a game plan that sets boundaries both partners in a couple can be comfortable with. This means the couple must consider all angles and talk them through before they go off to play. There's nothing worse than being asked as a couple if you do certain things, only to hear your partner and yourself giving opposite answers. The more possibilities you discuss beforehand, the less likely this is to happen.

Now if you passed that little test with flying colors, you can move on to the part about how swinging might be good for the relationship.

Again, the best way to work with these questions would be to go into separate rooms, think them over carefully on your own, then answer truthfully. When you've completed all five, get back together, compare notes and discuss.

The second set of questions is under "why do we want to do this?"

1) How well do we communicate?
a. We tell each other everything and trust each other with everything.
b. We can talk about most things, though there are certain sticky areas
c. We don’t talk about a lot of things, but when there's something big or important, we're OK.
d. We live separate lives and don't really talk much. But we're thinking that swinging will give us something mutually exciting to communicate about.

2) How healthy is our present sex life?
a) It's almost too hot to handle. We're a regular passion pair.
b) We have a pretty good sex life, especially when we get going.
c) Not as frequent as it used to be, and we've got issues, but we can still have a good tumble.
d) It's not really happening, at least in a very fulfilling way.

3) How experimental are we within our own sexual relationship?
a) We've tried just about everything, or we'll try anything.
b) He's more experimental; she's more reserved.
c) She's more experimental; he's more reserved.
d) We're stuck in a bit of a rut, but we're hoping some new faces and approaches will help us out of it.

4) How well do I know my partner's likes, fantasies, uncomfortable areas?
a) I know just about every little detail.
b) I know most of the important stuff -- I think.
c) I know some things, but I'm sure there are a lot of things I don't know.
d) I don't know much about my partner's fantasies, but hopefully that'll change.

5) How well does my partner know my likes, fantasies, uncomfortable areas?
a) I'm not squeamish about my fantasies. S/he pretty much knows it all.
b) Oh, there are a few things I'm keeping close to the vest.
c) I've told my partner the things I think s/he can handle. There's quite a bit s/he doesn't know yet.
d) I've never gotten around to telling my partner most of that stuff.


The couples who are most likely to swing successfully are those in which both partners have answered #1 to all the questions above. Consistent #2 responses are also promising, but you may want to discuss the reasons you didn't choose #1 and decide if the issues that come up are important enough for you to work them out before taking them with you into the destabilizing presence of one or two new people.

If your answers often go into the #3 range, you should probably work on strengthening these areas of the relationship before bringing in other people. And if you've got a lot of #4 responses, you could well be in a sinking relationship, hoping that swinging might keep you afloat. Just remember that jealousy, resentment, and pain may be the only products of swinging done without the proper foundation.

No matter where your relationship rests now, you can still set your sites on swinging. But you will make life so much easier for yourselves if you secure the warm relationship, mutual trust, and open, honest communication before you set out on the swinging path. Let swinging be your goal or reward once you've established a relationship that's as rock solid as it can be. This way, you approach swinging under the optimum circumstances.

Having said all this, it's often true that if you wait for everything to be perfect you never make a move. And some people enjoy a little risk or the excitement of feeling in over their heads, sorting things out as they go along. So take all this into account as you and your partner decide where to go from here. Good luck.